![]() If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them! Related Sub-reddits: Some vendors will be supporting releases for longer than six months. If you would like to download Java for free, you can get OpenJDK builds from the following vendors, among others:Īdoptium (formerly AdoptOpenJDK) RedHat Azul Amazon SAP Liberica JDK Dragonwell JDK GraalVM (High performance JIT) Oracle Microsoft With the introduction of the new release cadence, many have asked where they should download Java, and if it is still free. Join us on IRC #reddit-java Where should I download Java? ![]() No surveys, no job offers! Such content will be removed without warning.No programming help questions here! These should be posted in /r/javahelp.Do not post tutorials here! These should go in /r/learnjava.Upvote good content, downvote spam, don't pollute the discussion with things that should be settled in the vote count. Please seek help with Java programming in /r/Javahelp! Subreddit rules! These have separate subreddits - see below. You may need to experiment.Submit Link Submit Text Seek Programming Help News, Technical discussions, research papers and assorted things of interest related to the Java programming language NO programming help, NO learning Java related questions, NO installing or downloading Java questions, NO JVM languages - Exclusively Java analogous to the existing Ubuntu packages, 2) incorporating the relevant classes and native libraries into your application JAR, or 3) adding them to your applications classpath and library load path. However it is still worth a try (IMO).ġ - Options include 1) creating a custom Debian package(s) (or RPMs). On the other hand, the build instructions talk about generating modules, and module support is only available in Java 9 and later. So if that is accurate, you should be able to build OpenJFX 9 for OpenJDK 8. You may be able to repackage that into JARs and native libraries that you can include in your application.įor OpenJFX 9 and later, the build instructions are here:Īpparently, for N >= 9, OpenJFX version N is supposed to be supported for OpenJDK N and OpenJDK N - 1. The result of the build is (apparently) a ZIP file that is designed to be "overlayed" onto a JRE installation. So if you want to build a stand-alone OpenJFX 8 for use with OpenJDK 8, then you should try the following build instructions on the OpenJFX wiki: (The following is purely based on reading the OpenJFX build instructions. I think you will need to build your own copy of OpenJFX from source, and ( touch wood) "package it" with your application 1. Or any workaround (without installing anything) which works with OpenJDK 8? ![]() There are org.openjfx artifacts for OpenJFX 11 onwards, but they won't work with Java 8. Is there any javafx/OpenJFX dependency which can be used directly in the pom file so that it works with OpenJDK 8?ĪFAIK, no. "class file has wrong version 54.0, should be 52.0" while compiling javaFX project "class file has wrong version 54.0, should be 52.0" while trying to build JavaFX application Why is JavaFX is not included in OpenJDK 8 on Ubuntu Wily (15.10)? I have already gone through the below links And on trying to compile I getĬlass file has wrong version 54.0, should be 52.0 which is expected as it is build with Java 10Īny leads would be really helpful. The OpenJDK does not contain jfxrt.jar in its ext folder (as in case of Oracle JDK 8), and the versions of OpenJFX start from Java 9/10. I am using OpenJDK 8 and need to use javafx/OpenJFX within my swing application. I have gone through a lot of similar questions on SO, but the solution to use JFX/OpenFX with OpenJDK 8 is either to install the openjfx package in Ubuntu OR use Oracle JDK 8. Is there any javafx/OpenJFX dependency which can be used directly in the pom file so that it works with OpenJDK 8? Or any workaround (without installing anything) which works with OpenJDK 8?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |